Can quantum analogies help us to understand the process of thought

Paavo Pylkkänen

University of Skövde and University of Helsinki

In Globus, G., Pribram, H. & Vitiello, G. Eds. Brain and Being John Benjamins

The author looks at human thought processes with particular reference to the ideas of David Bohm. Bohm is indicated to have thought that while logical thought was important for the scientific effort, it might be a subset of more general thought processing, just as classical physics can be seen as a subset of quantum physics. Bohm considered that the basic thinking process was not logical. This was why new ideas could appear suddenly, often after a long period of unsuccesful but more logical work. He saw this as analogous to the quantum jump. Thus there might be a quantum-like general thinking process, which at a later stage has to be justified by more logical processes. Bohm thought it likely that quantum processes were involved in cognition, and that this accounted for the quantum-like nature of a lot of cognition. While most brain processes were admitted to be describable by classical physics, Bohm thought that there might be certain areas that were so finely balanced as to be described quantum mechanically. Further, in some altered states of consciousness, classical processes might play only a minor part, and this would allow holistic features to predominate.


Bohm, D. (1951) Quantum Theory Prentice-Hall Reprinted: Dover science books

Bohm, D. (1980) Wholeness and the Implicate Order Routledge

Bohm, D. (1990) A new theory of the relation of mind and matter Philosophical Psychology, 3 (2), 271-286

Bohm, D. & Hiley, B. (1993) The Undivided Universe

Fodor, J. & Pylyshyn, Z. (1988) Connectionism and cognitive architecture In Pinker, S. & Mehler, J. Eds. Connections and Symbols, pp. 3-71 MIT Press

Globus, G. (1995) The Postmodern Brain John Benjamins

Globus, G. (2003) Quantum closures and disclosures John Benjamins

Hiley, B. (2004) Information quantum theory and the brain In Globus, G., Pribram, K. & Vitiello, G. eds. Brain and Being John Benjamins

Husserl, E. (1913/1976) General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology George Allen & Unwin

Penrose, R. (1994) Shadows of the Mind Oxford University Press

Plotnitsky, A. (2002) After Bohr and Derrida Duke University Press

Pylkkänen, P. & Vaden, T. Eds. (2001) Dimensions of Consciousness John Benjamins

Smolensky, P. (1988) On the proper treatment of connectionism Behavioural and Brain Sciences

Strawson, P. (1966) Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason Routledge

Van Loocke, P. Ed. (2001) The Physical Nature of Consciousness John Benjamins

Vitiello, G. (2001) My Double Unveiled John Benjamins

Leave a Reply