Conscious Brain’s EM Field

Johnjoe McFadden

Professor of Molecular Genetics, University of Surrey

Synchronous Firing and its Influence on the the Conscious Brain’s Electromagnetic Field

Journal of Consciousness Studies, 9, No. 4, 2002, pp. 23-50

McFadden starts by stating that synchronous firing in the brain correlates with awareness and perception indicating that disturbances in the brain’s electromagnetic field also correlate with these. This field is a representation of neuronal information and its dynamics could be seen as a correlate of consciousness. McFadden views this field as the physical substrata of consciousness. Popper and Libet (1-4) have both suggested that consciousness might derive from am overarching field that could integrate the processing of neurons, but they did not think that this could be any known physical field. At the same time, there has been considerable interest in synchronous firing of neurons (Eckhorn 1988 & 1994) (Gray et al, 1989)(5-7). Awareness has been shown to correlate with the synchrony of firing in the 40-80Hz range, and this may bind together neurons involved in different aspects of the same visual perception, thus creating the unity of consciousness.

The brain’s electromagnetic field is induced by neuron firing, and also the movement of ions involved in the fluctuation of electrical potential along the cell membrane. The structure of the cortex tends to amplify the induced field. Experiments in the olfactory bulb (Freeman, 1991) (Freeman & Schneider, 1982)(8&9) have demonstrated EEG activity in response to sensory stimuli. Information about the stimuli related to the spatial pattern of the EEG amplitude.

The author concludes that the brain contains a highly structured extracellular electromagnetic field. The field is weak with the transmembrane fields being about 3,000 times stronger (Valberg et al, 1997) (10). It is suggested that neurotransmission through gap junctions may be voltage dependent and therefore sensitive to local fields (Draguhn et al, 1998) (Jefferys, 1995) (11&12). However, McFadden prefers to concentrate on the voltage-gated ion channels in the cell membranes, because their role is better understood.

Synchonous firing is thought to due to a large number of spatially distributed neurons (Lopes da Silva, 1998)(13). It is thought that many millions of neurons could be influenced by such firing. McFadden claims evidence for neuron communication via the electromagnetic field. The medical use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is taken to indicate the sensitivity of the brain to weak electromagnetic fields, and as this has impacts on behaviour, it is argued to impact neuronal computation and neuronal function (Chan & Nicholson, 1986) (Jefferys, 1981) (Gluckman et al, 1996) (14-16). Even when fields are weaker than the surrounding noise, they can modulate neurons (Douglas et al, 1993) (17). The brain’s electromagnetic field is argued to hold the same information as the neuron firing patterns. The widespread of the electomagnetic field would help to explain the unity of consciousness.

Clusters of neurons in the visual cortex have been shown to fire in synchrony in response to particular stimuli (Eckhorn, 1988 & 1994)(5&6), (Gray et al, 1989).(7) With insects, destruction of synchronous firing has been shown to reduce the ability to discriminate between stimuli. There is indirect evidence for the correlation between synchronous firing and attention and awareness in humans (Miltner et al, 1999) (Rodriguez et al, 1999) (Srinivasan et al, 1999)(18-20). The olfactory system of rabbits shows that the sensory information is encoded in the spatial pattern of the EEG, and therefore of the electromagnetic field. This correlation also reflected what a particular smell meant to the rabbit, when it had been trained to associate particular things with a smell. This suggested that the shape of the electromagnetic field could be related to perception and meaning. This is taken to suggest that consciousness is related to the electromagnetic field. Where there is habituation with a process and therefore less conscious activity there is a reduction in synchronous firing, so loss of awareness correlates with reduced disturbance in the brain’s electromagnetic field. The theory predicts that only activity that acts on the motor neurons is conscious. This is testable, although there is no direct evidence. The EEG shows that activity increases during creative thinking, declines with sleep but revives with REM dreaming (Molle et al, 1996) (21), so the amount of conscious activity correlates with the amount of electromagnetic activity.

The high conductivity of the cerebral fluid in the brain ventricles makes the brain into a kind of Faraday’s cage, insulating it from external electrical fields. However, it is much easier for magnetic fields to penetrate the brain and other tissues. Moving magnetic fields, such as those used in TMS do produce effects in the brain.

The Function of Consciousness

McFadden sides with those who argue that consciousness must have a function or evolution would not have selected for it. Field effects that had an advantageous effect on the performance of ion channels would have been selected for. Mcfadden thinks that there is information transfer between neurones during synchronous firing. He proposes that the neural circuits involved in conscious and unconscious activity differ in their sensitivity to the electromagnetic field. The conscious will is claimed to be our experience of the electromagnetic field. He thinks that consciousness is not actually the electromagnetic field, but its ability to transmit information to neurones. He also points out the difficulty of trying to perform two conscious tasks or a conscious and unconscious task at the same time. The two interfere with each other, while unconscious multi-tasking is possible.

Consciousness is required for the laying down of long-term memories and for most learning. The cemi field theory conceives that the electromagnetic field in the brain fine tunes the probabilities of neuron firings. The affected neurons may be part of large connected assemblies, and this leads to memory and learning. In simulated networks non-synaptic neuronal interactions via the eelctromagnetic field and also gap junctions enhance learning (Aronsson and Liljenstrom, 2001)(22). Modulation of long term potentiation by electomagnetic fields has also been demonstrated in vitro in rat hippocampal slices (Bawin et al, 1984)(23).

Free will

The author claims that free will is the subjective experience of the influence of the cemi field on neurons. However, the influence of the cemi field is seen as entirely deterministic. The fluctuations in the field that are capable of modulating the firing of neurons would all be generated by changing patterns of electrical activity, while the neurons themselves induce the field. The author admits that there might be some element of random quantum fluctuations in the field, but this randomness is unsuitable for producing free will.

The author, in common with others in consciousness studies, tries to have it both ways at this point. The functioning of the brain is claimed to be entirely deterministic, but something called ‘will’ is active in driving our conscious actions. This appears to be a clear a contradiction, since the whole idea of will is an agent which initiates something of its own accord.

The cemi theory might be seen as a near miss in terms of trying to provide a plausible explanation of consciousness. The author could have said that consciousness was a fundamental property of electrical charge, or individual charged particles, or the photons that intermediate it, thus making it a primitive or a brute fact of the universe. But he does not do this. He says that our conscious will is our experience of the influence of the cemi field. This seems to raise a host of questions and contradictions. If the cemi field isn’t conscious itself, who or what is experiencing it’s influence. This suggests a dualistic non-physical entity that experiences the action of the field. Even if we are happy with this concept it is not clear why this particular set of electromagnetic fields should produce this experience for this entity.

Like many before him, Mcfadden suddenly declares by fiat that one particular part of the otherwise ordinary material of the brain produces consciousness. Again, it is reasonable to say that evolution selected for a particular type of field that could fine tune the neurons, but the additional production of a feeling of free will, which is false has no demonstrable value. The author’s apparent need to stay within the deterministic fold appears to rob the theory of all explanatory value.

References:-

(1) Popper, K and Eccles, J. (1977) The Self and its Brain Springer International

(2) Popper, K. et al (1993) A discussion of the mind-brain problem Theor Med, 14, pp. 167-80

(3) Libet, B. (1994) A testable theory of mind-brain interaction..Journal of Consciousness Studies, 1 (1) pp. 119-26

(4) Libet, B. (1996) Conscious mind as a field Journal of Theoretical Biology, 178, pp. 223-6

(5) Eckhorn et al (1988) Coherent oscillations Biol. Cybern, 60, pp. 121-30

(6) Eckhorn, R. (1994) Oscillatory and non-oscillatory synchronisations in the visual cortex Prog. Brain Res, 102, pp. 405-26

(7) Gray et al (1989) Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex Nature, 338, pp. 334-7

(8) Freeman, W. & Schneider, W. (1982) Changes in spatial patterns of rabbit olfactory EEG Pyschophysiology, 19, pp.44-56

(9) Freeman, W. (1991) The physiology of perception Scientific American, February, pp. 78-85

(10) Valberg et al, (1997) Can low-level electrical and magnetic fields cause biological effects

(11) Draguhn et al (1998) Electrical coupling in the hippocampus Nature, 394. pp. 343-61

(12) Jefferys, J. (1995) Non-synaptic modulation of neuronal activity Physiolog. Review, 75, pp. 689-723

(13) Lopes da Silva (1998) Dynamics of EEGs as signals of neuronal populations in Electroencephalography: basic principles ed. E. Niefermeyer & F. Lopes da Silva

(14) Chan, C. & Nicholson, C. (1986) Modulation by electric fields of activity in the cerebellum Journal of Physiology, 371, pp. 89-114

(15) Jefferys, J. (1981) Influences of electric fields in hippocampal slices Journal of Physiology, 319, pp. 143-52

(16) Gluckman et al (1996) Electric field suppression in hippocampal slices Journal of Neurophysiology, 76, pp. 4202-5

(17) Douglas et al (1996) Noise enhancment of information transfer Nature, 365, pp. 337-40

(18) Miltner et al (1999) Coherence of gamma band EEG as a basis for learning Nature, 397, pp. 434-6

(19) Rodriguez et al, (1996) Perception’s shadow: Long distance synchronisation of brain activity Nature, 397, pp. 430-3

(20) Srinivasan et al, (1999) Increased synchronisation of neuromagnetic responses during conscious perception Journal of Neuroscience, 19, pp. 5435-48

(21) Molle et al, (1996) Enhanced dynamic complexity during creative thinking Neuroscience Letters, 208, pp. 61-4

(22) Aronsson, P. & Liljenstrom, H. (2001) Effects of non-synaptic neuronal interaction on learning International Journal of Neural Systems, 7, pp. 369-76

(23) Bawin et al (1984) Influence of electric fields in the hippocmpal slice Brain Research 323, pp. 227-37

Block, N. (1991) Troubles with functionalism in The Nature of Mental States ed D. Rosenthal Oxford University Press

Block, N. (1995) On a confusion about a function of consciousness Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 18, pp. 227-47

Chalmers, D. (1995a) Absent qualia, dancing qualia, fading qualia in Conscious Experience ed. T. Metzinger Imprint Academic

Chalmers, D. (1995b) Facing up to the problem of consciousness Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2, (3) pp. 200-19

McFadden, J. (2000) Quantum Evolution Harper Collins

Nagel, T. (1974) What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review, 83, pp. 435-50

Penrose, R. (1995) Shadows of the Mind Oxford University Press

Searle, J. (1980) Minds, brains and programmes Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 3, pp. 417-57

Searle, J. (1992) The Rediscovery of the Mind MIT Press

Aronsson, P. & Lilenstrom, H (2001) Effects of non-synaptic neuronal interaction Biosystems, 63, pp. 43-56

Block, N. (1991) Troubles with functionalism in the Nature of Mental States ed. D. Rosenthal Oxford University Press

Block, N. (1995) On a confusion about a function of consciousness Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 18, pp. 227-47

One Response

  1. […] brain’s electromagnetic field could correlate with consciousness. In fact, it might even be the underlying physical process of […]

Leave a Reply