Chalmers asks why it is that we are conscious, and argues that a radical idea is required if we are to arrive at an explanation. Recent research has concentrated on searching for correlates of consciousness, such as brain regions that are active when consciousness is reported. However, such correlates are just things that coincide with consciousness rather than explanations. Emergence has also been seen as an explanation of consciousness, in the sense that hurricanes emerge from particular weather systems, and by analogy, consciousness emerges from neural systems and possibly also computer systems. However, Chalmers sees this as only explaining structure and behaviour rather than consciousness as such.
Archive for April, 2015
This study demonstrates how neurons that are active when the subject chooses whether to have a small reward now or a larger reward in the future are inactive when the choice is made for the subject, implying a physical brain distinction between freewill and its absence.
ON SPECIAL RELATIVITY Based on material from Roger Penrose and David Bohm While quantum theory and still more its implications have been censored out of much of popular thought and education, relativity may have had the opposite fate of being popularised as a wow! factor, with possibly a lack of balance as to what is really important about the theory. Mass-energy equivalence It could be argued that mass-energy equivalence is of greater significance than more crowd-stopping ideas such as Read more […]
The emergence of primary anoetic consciousness in episodic memory Frontiers in Behavioural Science, 3 January 2014, doi: 10.3389/fnbeh :: Marie Vanderkerckhover, Luis Bulnes & Jaak Panksepp, Vrije University Brussels, Washington Uiversity :: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3879583/ Summary and review of the above paper The authors discuss how emotional experience becomes cognitively orientated in areas such as the episodic memory. The episodic memory has the ability Read more […]